From: Xuewei Zhang xueweiz@google.com
commit 4929a4e6faa0f13289a67cae98139e727f0d4a97 upstream.
The quota/period ratio is used to ensure a child task group won't get more bandwidth than the parent task group, and is calculated as:
normalized_cfs_quota() = [(quota_us << 20) / period_us]
If the quota/period ratio was changed during this scaling due to precision loss, it will cause inconsistency between parent and child task groups.
See below example:
A userspace container manager (kubelet) does three operations:
1) Create a parent cgroup, set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us. 2) Create a few children cgroups. 3) Set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us on a child cgroup.
These operations are expected to succeed. However, if the scaling of 147/128 happens before step 3, quota and period of the parent cgroup will be changed:
new_quota: 1148437ns, 1148us new_period: 11484375ns, 11484us
And when step 3 comes in, the ratio of the child cgroup will be 104857, which will be larger than the parent cgroup ratio (104821), and will fail.
Scaling them by a factor of 2 will fix the problem.
Tested-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Xuewei Zhang xueweiz@google.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Acked-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Cc: Anton Blanchard anton@ozlabs.org Cc: Ben Segall bsegall@google.com Cc: Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Mel Gorman mgorman@suse.de Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Fixes: 2e8e19226398 ("sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191004001243.140897-1-xueweiz@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4391,20 +4391,28 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_pe if (++count > 3) { u64 new, old = ktime_to_ns(cfs_b->period);
- new = (old * 147) / 128; /* ~115% */ - new = min(new, max_cfs_quota_period); + /* + * Grow period by a factor of 2 to avoid losing precision. + * Precision loss in the quota/period ratio can cause __cfs_schedulable + * to fail. + */ + new = old * 2; + if (new < max_cfs_quota_period) { + cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(new); + cfs_b->quota *= 2;
- cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(new); - - /* since max is 1s, this is limited to 1e9^2, which fits in u64 */ - cfs_b->quota *= new; - cfs_b->quota = div64_u64(cfs_b->quota, old); - - pr_warn_ratelimited( - "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n", - smp_processor_id(), - div_u64(new, NSEC_PER_USEC), - div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC)); + pr_warn_ratelimited( + "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us = %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n", + smp_processor_id(), + div_u64(new, NSEC_PER_USEC), + div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC)); + } else { + pr_warn_ratelimited( + "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, but cannot scale up without losing precision (cfs_period_us = %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n", + smp_processor_id(), + div_u64(old, NSEC_PER_USEC), + div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC)); + }
/* reset count so we don't come right back in here */ count = 0;