6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
[ Upstream commit 80fb40baba19e25a1b6f3ecff6fc5c0171806bde ]
This is a follow-up to 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark"). sk->sk_mark can be read and written without holding the socket lock. IPv6 equivalent is already covered with READ_ONCE() annotation in tcp_v6_send_response().
Fixes: 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f459d1fc44f205e13f6d8bdca2c8bfb9902ffac9.1736244569... Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index 984435cb1013..805b1a9eca1c 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net); if (sk) { ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ? - inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : sk->sk_mark; + inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_mark); ctl_sk->sk_priority = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ? inet_twsk(sk)->tw_priority : sk->sk_priority; transmit_time = tcp_transmit_time(sk);