From: Nathan Chancellor natechancellor@gmail.com
Clang warns when one enumerated type is implicitly converted to another:
drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:845:19: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum sprd_pinconf_params' to different enumeration type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wenum-conversion] {"sprd,control", SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_CONTROL, 0}, ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:846:22: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum sprd_pinconf_params' to different enumeration type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wenum-conversion] {"sprd,sleep-mode", SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_SLEEP_MODE, 0}, ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is expected that pinctrl drivers can extend pin_config_param because of the gap between PIN_CONFIG_END and PIN_CONFIG_MAX so this conversion isn't an issue. Most drivers that take advantage of this define the PIN_CONFIG variables as constants, rather than enumerated values. Do the same thing here so that Clang no longer warns.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/138 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor natechancellor@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linaro.org --- drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c index 6352991..83958bd 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c @@ -159,10 +159,8 @@ struct sprd_pinctrl { struct sprd_pinctrl_soc_info *info; };
-enum sprd_pinconf_params { - SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_CONTROL = PIN_CONFIG_END + 1, - SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_SLEEP_MODE = PIN_CONFIG_END + 2, -}; +#define SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_CONTROL (PIN_CONFIG_END + 1) +#define SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_SLEEP_MODE (PIN_CONFIG_END + 2)
static int sprd_pinctrl_get_id_by_name(struct sprd_pinctrl *sprd_pctl, const char *name)