6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Katya Orlova e.orlova@ispras.ru
[ Upstream commit efc0b0bcffcba60d9c6301063d25a22a4744b499 ]
In addition to the EINVAL, there may be an ENOMEM.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 70431bfd825d ("cifs: Support fscache indexing rewrite") Signed-off-by: Katya Orlova e.orlova@ispras.ru Signed-off-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/smb/client/fscache.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/fscache.c b/fs/smb/client/fscache.c index f6f3a6b75601b..e73625b5d0cc6 100644 --- a/fs/smb/client/fscache.c +++ b/fs/smb/client/fscache.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int cifs_fscache_get_super_cookie(struct cifs_tcon *tcon) sharename = extract_sharename(tcon->tree_name); if (IS_ERR(sharename)) { cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s: couldn't extract sharename\n", __func__); - return -EINVAL; + return PTR_ERR(sharename); }
slen = strlen(sharename);