The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x fca432e73db2bec0fdbfbf6d98d3ebcd5388a977 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2024123006-unhappy-grudge-df18@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fca432e73db2bec0fdbfbf6d98d3ebcd5388a977 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:00:56 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: sysfs: fix direct super block member reads
The following sysfs entries are reading super block member directly, which can have a different endian and cause wrong values:
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/nodesize - sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/sectorsize - sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/clone_alignment
Thankfully those values (nodesize and sectorsize) are always aligned inside the btrfs_super_block, so it won't trigger unaligned read errors, just endian problems.
Fix them by using the native cached members instead.
Fixes: df93589a1737 ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c index fdcbf650ac31..7f09b6c9cc2d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_nodesize_show(struct kobject *kobj, { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->nodesize); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->nodesize); }
BTRFS_ATTR(, nodesize, btrfs_nodesize_show); @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_sectorsize_show(struct kobject *kobj, { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->sectorsize); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->sectorsize); }
BTRFS_ATTR(, sectorsize, btrfs_sectorsize_show); @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_clone_alignment_show(struct kobject *kobj, { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->sectorsize); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->sectorsize); }
BTRFS_ATTR(, clone_alignment, btrfs_clone_alignment_show);