From: Dmitry Antipov dmantipov@yandex.ru
[ Upstream commit dcce94b80a954a8968ff29fafcfb066d6197fa9a ]
When compiling with gcc 13.1 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following:
In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’, inlined from ‘mwifiex_construct_tdls_action_frame’ at drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c:765:3, inlined from ‘mwifiex_send_tdls_action_frame’ at drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c:856:6: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:529:25: warning: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] 529 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The compiler actually complains on:
memmove(pos + ETH_ALEN, &mgmt->u.action.category, sizeof(mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp));
and it happens because the fortification logic interprets this as an attempt to overread 1-byte 'u.action.category' member of 'struct ieee80211_mgmt'. To silence this warning, it's enough to pass an address of 'u.action' itself instead of an address of its first member.
This also fixes an improper usage of 'sizeof()'. Since 'skb' is extended with 'sizeof(mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp) + 1' bytes (where 1 is actually 'sizeof(mgmt->u.action.category)'), I assume that the same number of bytes should be copied.
Suggested-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov dmantipov@yandex.ru Reviewed-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo kvalo@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230629085115.180499-2-dmantipov@yandex.ru Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c index 80d20fb6f3480..a69b4983747f3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/tdls.c @@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ mwifiex_construct_tdls_action_frame(struct mwifiex_private *priv, int ret; u16 capab; struct ieee80211_ht_cap *ht_cap; + unsigned int extra; u8 radio, *pos;
capab = priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.cap_info_bitmap; @@ -755,7 +756,10 @@ mwifiex_construct_tdls_action_frame(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
switch (action_code) { case WLAN_PUB_ACTION_TDLS_DISCOVER_RES: - skb_put(skb, sizeof(mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp) + 1); + /* See the layout of 'struct ieee80211_mgmt'. */ + extra = sizeof(mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp) + + sizeof(mgmt->u.action.category); + skb_put(skb, extra); mgmt->u.action.category = WLAN_CATEGORY_PUBLIC; mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp.action_code = WLAN_PUB_ACTION_TDLS_DISCOVER_RES; @@ -764,8 +768,7 @@ mwifiex_construct_tdls_action_frame(struct mwifiex_private *priv, mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp.capability = cpu_to_le16(capab); /* move back for addr4 */ - memmove(pos + ETH_ALEN, &mgmt->u.action.category, - sizeof(mgmt->u.action.u.tdls_discover_resp)); + memmove(pos + ETH_ALEN, &mgmt->u.action, extra); /* init address 4 */ memcpy(pos, bc_addr, ETH_ALEN);