6.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Howard Hsu howard-yh.hsu@mediatek.com
[ Upstream commit 9ca65757f0a5b393a7737d37f377d5daf91716af ]
If a VIF acts as a beamformer, it should check peer's beamformee capability, and vice versa.
Fixes: ba01944adee9 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: add EHT beamforming support") Signed-off-by: Howard Hsu howard-yh.hsu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Shayne Chen shayne.chen@mediatek.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240816094635.2391-7-shayne.chen@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau nbd@nbd.name Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c index e68724e54013c..daef014954d02 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c @@ -1429,10 +1429,10 @@ mt7996_is_ebf_supported(struct mt7996_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
if (bfee) return vif->bss_conf.eht_su_beamformee && - EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE, pe->phy_cap_info[0]); + EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER, pe->phy_cap_info[0]); else return vif->bss_conf.eht_su_beamformer && - EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER, pe->phy_cap_info[0]); + EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE, pe->phy_cap_info[0]); }
if (sta->deflink.he_cap.has_he) {