On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:07:17AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Jason,
we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the dependencies!
I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.
Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the cover letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches goes through which tree.
Just in general don't send such a jumble of patches for multiple maintainers under one cover letter. It is error prone to sort it out.
Jason