Hi Matt,
- /*
* Do not create the command streamer for CCS slices beyond the first.
* All the workload submitted to the first engine will be shared among
* all the slices.
*
* Once the user will be allowed to customize the CCS mode, then this
* check needs to be removed.
*/
- if (IS_DG2(gt->i915)) {
intel_engine_mask_t first_ccs = BIT((CCS0 + __ffs(CCS_MASK(gt))));
intel_engine_mask_t all_ccs = CCS_MASK(gt) << CCS0;
info->engine_mask &= ~(all_ccs &= ~first_ccs);
Shouldn't the second "&=" just be an "&" since there's no need to modify the all_ccs variable that never gets used again?
yes, that's a leftover from me trying different ways of removing all the non first CCS engines.
In fact since this is DG2-specific, it seems like it might be more intuitive to just write the whole thing more directly as
if (IS_DG2(gt->i915)) { int first_ccs = __ffs(CCS_MASK(gt)); info->engine_mask &= ~GENMASK(CCS3, CCS0); info->engine_mask |= BIT(_CCS(first_ccs)); }
yes, looks a bit simpler. Will use this way.
But up to you; if you just want to remove the unnecessary "=" that's fine too. Either way,
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks!
Andi