6.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org
commit 84be856cc87317bc60ff54bd7c8f8a5aa8f0e2c8 upstream.
damon_test_set_filters_default_reject() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251101182021.74868-17-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 094fb14913c7 ("mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: add a test for damos_set_filters_default_reject()") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Cc: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Cc: David Gow davidgow@google.com Cc: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [6.16+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h @@ -617,6 +617,8 @@ static void damon_test_set_filters_defau KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, false);
target_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_TARGET, true, true); + if (!target_filter) + kunit_skip(test, "filter alloc fail"); damos_add_filter(&scheme, target_filter); damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme); /* @@ -642,6 +644,10 @@ static void damon_test_set_filters_defau KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, false);
anon_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true, true); + if (!anon_filter) { + damos_free_filter(target_filter); + kunit_skip(test, "anon_filter alloc fail"); + } damos_add_filter(&scheme, anon_filter);
damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);