4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Scott Wood swood@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit ff987fcf011d20c53b3a613edf6e2055ea48e26e ]
__reload_late() is called from stop_machine context and thus cannot acquire a non-raw spinlock on PREEMPT_RT.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood swood@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Ashok Raj ashok.raj@intel.com Cc: Clark Williams williams@redhat.com Cc: Pei Zhang pezhang@redhat.com Cc: x86-ml x86@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524154420.24455-1-swood@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex); /* * Serialize late loading so that CPUs get updated one-by-one. */ -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(update_lock); +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(update_lock);
struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
@@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info) if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in, NSEC_PER_SEC)) return -1;
- spin_lock(&update_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&update_lock); apply_microcode_local(&err); - spin_unlock(&update_lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&update_lock);
/* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */ if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) {