6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit df330c808182a8beab5d0f84a6cbc9cff76c61fc ]
If a match was not found, then the write_raw() callback would return the odr index, not an error. Return -EINVAL if this occurs. To avoid similar issues in future, introduce j, a new indexing variable rather than using ret for this purpose.
Fixes: 79de2ee469aa ("iio: accel: mma8452: claim direct mode during write raw") Reviewed-by: David Lechner dlechner@baylibre.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250217140135.896574-2-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c index 62e6369e22696..de207526babee 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static int mma8452_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int val, int val2, long mask) { struct mma8452_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); - int i, ret; + int i, j, ret;
ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev); if (ret) @@ -771,14 +771,18 @@ static int mma8452_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, break;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO: - ret = mma8452_get_odr_index(data); + j = mma8452_get_odr_index(data);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mma8452_os_ratio); i++) { - if (mma8452_os_ratio[i][ret] == val) { + if (mma8452_os_ratio[i][j] == val) { ret = mma8452_set_power_mode(data, i); break; } } + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(mma8452_os_ratio)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + break; + } break; default: ret = -EINVAL;