On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:30 AM Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 05:32:55PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
From: Dave Chinner dchinner@redhat.com
commit 56486f307100e8fc66efa2ebd8a71941fa10bf6f upstream.
xfs/538 on a 1kB block filesystem failed with this assert:
XFS: Assertion failed: cur->bc_btnum != XFS_BTNUM_BMAP || cur->bc_ino.allocated == 0 || xfs_is_shutdown(cur->bc_mp), file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 448
You haven't mentioned that you combined a second upstream commit into this patch to fix the bug in this commit.....
I am confused.
patch [5.10 7/8] xfs: consider shutdown in bmapbt cursor delete assert is the patch that I backported from 5.12 and posted for review. This patch [5.10 8/8] is the patch from 5.19-rc1 that you pointed out that I should take to fix the bug in patch [5.10 7/8].
The upstream commits correspond to the original commits each.
If I missed anything, please correct me and I will fix it.
Thanks, Amir.