From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com
commit 1fac4a54374f7ef385938f3c6cf7649c0fe4f6cd upstream.
[BUG] One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free:
BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265 BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579
CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P OE 5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7b/0xba print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] kasan_report+0x12/0x17 __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20 btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs] ? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400 ? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs] ? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720 ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0 ? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030 worker_thread+0x98/0x1030 kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720 ? kthread_park+0x120/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Allocated by task 369692: __kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs] btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs] relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs] relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Freed by task 369692: __kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xd8/0x270 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs] clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096 The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of 4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head) raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^ ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ================================================================== BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28
[CAUSE] The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead. (Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup usage.)
That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it.
The following race could cause the use-after-free problem:
CPU1 | CPU2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | relocate_block_group() | |- unset_reloc_control(rc) | |- btrfs_commit_transaction() btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | |- clean_dirty_subvols() |- btrfs_join_transaction() | | |- record_root_in_trans() | | |- btrfs_init_reloc_root() | | |- if (root->reloc_root) | | | | |- root->reloc_root = NULL | | |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root); |- reloc_root->last_trans| = trans->transid | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Use after free
[FIX] Fix it by the following modifications:
- Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to create or update root->reloc_tree
- Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped reloc tree To co-operate with above modification, so as long as BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create reloc tree at record_root_in_trans().
Reported-by: Cebtenzzre cebtenzzre@gmail.com Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c @@ -1434,6 +1434,13 @@ int btrfs_init_reloc_root(struct btrfs_t int clear_rsv = 0; int ret;
+ /* + * The subvolume has reloc tree but the swap is finished, no need to + * create/update the dead reloc tree + */ + if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state)) + return 0; + if (root->reloc_root) { reloc_root = root->reloc_root; reloc_root->last_trans = trans->transid; @@ -2186,7 +2193,6 @@ static int clean_dirty_subvols(struct re /* Merged subvolume, cleanup its reloc root */ struct btrfs_root *reloc_root = root->reloc_root;
- clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state); list_del_init(&root->reloc_dirty_list); root->reloc_root = NULL; if (reloc_root) { @@ -2195,6 +2201,7 @@ static int clean_dirty_subvols(struct re if (ret2 < 0 && !ret) ret = ret2; } + clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state); btrfs_put_fs_root(root); } else { /* Orphan reloc tree, just clean it up */