4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shawn Bohrer sbohrer@cloudflare.com
commit c78e7818f16f687389174c4569243abbec8dc68f upstream.
Most of the time these were the same value anyway, but when CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled we would use a smaller number of locks to reduce overhead. Unfortunately having two values is confusing and not worth the complexity.
This fixes a bug where tree_gc_worker() would only GC up to CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS trees which meant when CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled not all trees would be GCed by tree_gc_worker().
Fixes: 5c789e131cbb9 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer sbohrer@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c | 19 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c @@ -33,12 +33,6 @@
#define CONNCOUNT_SLOTS 256U
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP -#define CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS 8U -#else -#define CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS 256U -#endif - #define CONNCOUNT_GC_MAX_NODES 8 #define MAX_KEYLEN 5
@@ -60,7 +54,7 @@ struct nf_conncount_rb { struct rcu_head rcu_head; };
-static spinlock_t nf_conncount_locks[CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp; +static spinlock_t nf_conncount_locks[CONNCOUNT_SLOTS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
struct nf_conncount_data { unsigned int keylen; @@ -353,7 +347,7 @@ insert_tree(struct net *net, unsigned int count = 0, gc_count = 0; bool node_found = false;
- spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS]); + spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash]);
parent = NULL; rbnode = &(root->rb_node); @@ -430,7 +424,7 @@ insert_tree(struct net *net, rb_link_node_rcu(&rbconn->node, parent, rbnode); rb_insert_color(&rbconn->node, root); out_unlock: - spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS]); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash]); return count; }
@@ -499,7 +493,7 @@ static void tree_gc_worker(struct work_s struct rb_node *node; unsigned int tree, next_tree, gc_count = 0;
- tree = data->gc_tree % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS; + tree = data->gc_tree % CONNCOUNT_SLOTS; root = &data->root[tree];
rcu_read_lock(); @@ -621,10 +615,7 @@ static int __init nf_conncount_modinit(v { int i;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS > CONNCOUNT_SLOTS); - BUILD_BUG_ON((CONNCOUNT_SLOTS % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS) != 0); - - for (i = 0; i < CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS; ++i) + for (i = 0; i < CONNCOUNT_SLOTS; ++i) spin_lock_init(&nf_conncount_locks[i]);
conncount_conn_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conncount_tuple",