6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sven Schnelle svens@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit a88c26bb8e04ee5f2678225c0130a5fbc08eef85 ]
exrl is present in all machines currently supported, therefore prefer it over ex. This saves one instruction and doesn't need an additional register to hold the address of the target instruction.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle svens@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev agordeev@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h index 9a5236acc0a86..21ae93cbd8e47 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h @@ -162,8 +162,7 @@ static __always_inline void __stackleak_poison(unsigned long erase_low, " la %[addr],256(%[addr])\n" " brctg %[tmp],0b\n" "1: stg %[poison],0(%[addr])\n" - " larl %[tmp],3f\n" - " ex %[count],0(%[tmp])\n" + " exrl %[count],3f\n" " j 4f\n" "2: stg %[poison],0(%[addr])\n" " j 4f\n"