From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com
commit bf871c3b43b1dcc3f2a076ff39a8f1ce7959d958 upstream.
To follow the standard behavior of tree-checker.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn jthumshirn@suse.de Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com [bwh: Cherry-picked for 4.19 to ease backporting later fixes] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void chunk_err(const struct btrfs /* * The common chunk check which could also work on super block sys chunk array. * - * Return -EIO if anything is corrupted. + * Return -EUCLEAN if anything is corrupted. * Return 0 if everything is OK. */ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, @@ -520,31 +520,31 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs if (!num_stripes) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "invalid chunk num_stripes, have %u", num_stripes); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } if (!IS_ALIGNED(logical, fs_info->sectorsize)) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "invalid chunk logical, have %llu should aligned to %u", logical, fs_info->sectorsize); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } if (btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk) != fs_info->sectorsize) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "invalid chunk sectorsize, have %u expect %u", btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk), fs_info->sectorsize); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } if (!length || !IS_ALIGNED(length, fs_info->sectorsize)) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "invalid chunk length, have %llu", length); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } if (!is_power_of_2(stripe_len) || stripe_len != BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "invalid chunk stripe length: %llu", stripe_len); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & type) { @@ -553,14 +553,14 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk)); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; }
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "missing chunk type flag, have 0x%llx one bit must be set in 0x%llx", type, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; }
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) && @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; }
features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(fs_info->super_copy); @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) { chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical, "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; } }
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu", num_stripes, sub_stripes, type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK); - return -EIO; + return -EUCLEAN; }
return 0;