On 6/6/25 10:17, Qiu-ji Chen wrote:
Fixed a flag reuse bug in the mtk_cqdma_tx_status() function.
If the first spin_lock_irqsave already saved the irq flags and disabled them, would it be meaningful to actually use a simple spin_lock for the second lock ? Or rather spin_lock_nested since there is a second nested lock taken ?
Eugen
Hello Eugen,
Thanks for helpful suggestion. The modification has been submitted in patch v2 as discussed.
Best regards, Qiu-ji Chen