6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chris Mason clm@fb.com
[ Upstream commit 155213a2aed42c85361bf4f5c817f5cb68951c3b ]
schbench (https://github.com/masoncl/schbench.git) is showing a regression from previous production kernels that bisected down to:
sched/fair: Remove sysctl_sched_migration_cost condition (c5b0a7eefc)
The schbench command line was:
schbench -L -m 4 -M auto -t 256 -n 0 -r 0 -s 0
This creates 4 message threads pinned to CPUs 0-3, and 256x4 worker threads spread across the rest of the CPUs. Neither the worker threads or the message threads do any work, they just wake each other up and go back to sleep as soon as possible.
The end result is the first 4 CPUs are pegged waking up those 1024 workers, and the rest of the CPUs are constantly banging in and out of idle. If I take a v6.9 Linus kernel and revert that one commit, performance goes from 3.4M RPS to 5.4M RPS.
schedstat shows there are ~100x more new idle balance operations, and profiling shows the worker threads are spending ~20% of their CPU time on new idle balance. schedstats also shows that almost all of these new idle balance attemps are failing to find busy groups.
The fix used here is to crank up the cost of the newidle balance whenever it fails. Since we don't want sd->max_newidle_lb_cost to grow out of control, this also changes update_newidle_cost() to use sysctl_sched_migration_cost as the upper limit on max_newidle_lb_cost.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason clm@fb.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Acked-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250626144017.1510594-2-clm@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 6ce3028e6e85..1cf43e91ae9d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -11697,8 +11697,14 @@ static inline bool update_newidle_cost(struct sched_domain *sd, u64 cost) /* * Track max cost of a domain to make sure to not delay the * next wakeup on the CPU. + * + * sched_balance_newidle() bumps the cost whenever newidle + * balance fails, and we don't want things to grow out of + * control. Use the sysctl_sched_migration_cost as the upper + * limit, plus a litle extra to avoid off by ones. */ - sd->max_newidle_lb_cost = cost; + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost = + min(cost, sysctl_sched_migration_cost + 200); sd->last_decay_max_lb_cost = jiffies; } else if (time_after(jiffies, sd->last_decay_max_lb_cost + HZ)) { /* @@ -12384,10 +12390,17 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
t1 = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu); domain_cost = t1 - t0; - update_newidle_cost(sd, domain_cost); - curr_cost += domain_cost; t0 = t1; + + /* + * Failing newidle means it is not effective; + * bump the cost so we end up doing less of it. + */ + if (!pulled_task) + domain_cost = (3 * sd->max_newidle_lb_cost) / 2; + + update_newidle_cost(sd, domain_cost); }
/*