From: John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 84f44df664e9f0e261157e16ee1acd77cc1bb78d ]
Similar to patch ("bpf: sock_ops ctx access may stomp registers") if the src_reg = dst_reg when reading the sk field of a sock_ops struct we generate xlated code,
53: (61) r9 = *(u32 *)(r9 +28) 54: (15) if r9 == 0x0 goto pc+3 56: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 +0)
This stomps on the r9 reg to do the sk_fullsock check and then when reading the skops->sk field instead of the sk pointer we get the sk_fullsock. To fix use similar pattern noted in the previous fix and use the temp field to save/restore a register used to do sk_fullsock check.
After the fix the generated xlated code reads,
52: (7b) *(u64 *)(r9 +32) = r8 53: (61) r8 = *(u32 *)(r9 +28) 54: (15) if r9 == 0x0 goto pc+3 55: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 +32) 56: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 +0) 57: (05) goto pc+1 58: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 +32)
Here r9 register was in-use so r8 is chosen as the temporary register. In line 52 r8 is saved in temp variable and at line 54 restored in case fullsock != 0. Finally we handle fullsock == 0 case by restoring at line 58.
This adds a new macro SOCK_OPS_GET_SK it is almost possible to merge this with SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD, but I found the extra branch logic a bit more confusing than just adding a new macro despite a bit of duplicating code.
Fixes: 1314ef561102e ("bpf: export bpf_sock for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS prog type") Signed-off-by: John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau kafai@fb.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159718349653.4728.6559437186853473612.stgit@john... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/core/filter.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index dcc06e510ec5d..9c03702600128 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -8107,6 +8107,43 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, } \ } while (0)
+#define SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() \ + do { \ + int fullsock_reg = si->dst_reg, reg = BPF_REG_9, jmp = 1; \ + if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg) \ + reg--; \ + if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg) \ + reg--; \ + if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) { \ + *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, si->src_reg, reg, \ + offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \ + temp)); \ + fullsock_reg = reg; \ + jmp += 2; \ + } \ + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( \ + struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \ + is_fullsock), \ + fullsock_reg, si->src_reg, \ + offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \ + is_fullsock)); \ + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, fullsock_reg, 0, jmp); \ + if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) \ + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, si->src_reg, \ + offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \ + temp)); \ + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( \ + struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk),\ + si->dst_reg, si->src_reg, \ + offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk));\ + if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) { \ + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_A(1); \ + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, si->src_reg, \ + offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \ + temp)); \ + } \ + } while (0) + #define SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP_SOCK_FIELD(FIELD) \ SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD(FIELD, FIELD, struct tcp_sock)
@@ -8391,17 +8428,7 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP_SOCK_FIELD(bytes_acked); break; case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk): - *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( - struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, - is_fullsock), - si->dst_reg, si->src_reg, - offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, - is_fullsock)); - *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, si->dst_reg, 0, 1); - *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( - struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk), - si->dst_reg, si->src_reg, - offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk)); + SOCK_OPS_GET_SK(); break; } return insn - insn_buf;