4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit cfb03be6c7e8a1591285849c361d67b09f5149f7 ]
The following lockdep splat was observed:
[ 1222.241750] ====================================================== [ 1222.271301] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1222.301060] 4.16.0-10.el8+5.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted [ 1222.326659] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1222.356565] systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1222.382660] ((&ioat_chan->timer)){+.-.}, at: [<00000000f71e1a28>] del_timer_sync+0x5/0xf0 [ 1222.422928] [ 1222.422928] but task is already holding lock: [ 1222.451743] (&(&ioat_chan->prep_lock)->rlock){+.-.}, at: [<000000008ea98b12>] ioat_shutdown+0x86/0x100 [ioatdma] : [ 1223.524987] Chain exists of: [ 1223.524987] (&ioat_chan->timer) --> &(&ioat_chan->cleanup_lock)->rlock --> &(&ioat_chan->prep_lock)->rlock [ 1223.524987] [ 1223.594082] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1223.594082] [ 1223.622630] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1223.645080] ---- ---- [ 1223.667404] lock(&(&ioat_chan->prep_lock)->rlock); [ 1223.691535] lock(&(&ioat_chan->cleanup_lock)->rlock); [ 1223.728657] lock(&(&ioat_chan->prep_lock)->rlock); [ 1223.765122] lock((&ioat_chan->timer)); [ 1223.784095] [ 1223.784095] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1223.784095] [ 1223.813492] 4 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1: [ 1223.834677] #0: (reboot_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000056d33456>] SYSC_reboot+0x10f/0x300 [ 1223.873310] #1: (&dev->mutex){....}, at: [<00000000258dfdd7>] device_shutdown+0x1c8/0x660 [ 1223.913604] #2: (&dev->mutex){....}, at: [<0000000068331147>] device_shutdown+0x1d6/0x660 [ 1223.954000] #3: (&(&ioat_chan->prep_lock)->rlock){+.-.}, at: [<000000008ea98b12>] ioat_shutdown+0x86/0x100 [ioatdma]
In the ioat_shutdown() function:
spin_lock_bh(&ioat_chan->prep_lock); set_bit(IOAT_CHAN_DOWN, &ioat_chan->state); del_timer_sync(&ioat_chan->timer); spin_unlock_bh(&ioat_chan->prep_lock);
According to the synchronization rule for the del_timer_sync() function, the caller must not hold locks which would prevent completion of the timer's handler.
The timer structure has its own lock that manages its synchronization. Setting the IOAT_CHAN_DOWN bit should prevent other CPUs from trying to use that device anyway, there is probably no need to call del_timer_sync() while holding the prep_lock. So the del_timer_sync() call is now moved outside of the prep_lock critical section to prevent the circular lock dependency.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang dave.jiang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/dma/ioat/init.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c @@ -1210,8 +1210,15 @@ static void ioat_shutdown(struct pci_dev
spin_lock_bh(&ioat_chan->prep_lock); set_bit(IOAT_CHAN_DOWN, &ioat_chan->state); - del_timer_sync(&ioat_chan->timer); spin_unlock_bh(&ioat_chan->prep_lock); + /* + * Synchronization rule for del_timer_sync(): + * - The caller must not hold locks which would prevent + * completion of the timer's handler. + * So prep_lock cannot be held before calling it. + */ + del_timer_sync(&ioat_chan->timer); + /* this should quiesce then reset */ ioat_reset_hw(ioat_chan); }