6.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org
commit fafe953de2c661907c94055a2497c6b8dbfd26f3 upstream.
damon_test_target() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251101182021.74868-4-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Cc: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Cc: David Gow davidgow@google.com Cc: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [5.15+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h @@ -58,7 +58,14 @@ static void damon_test_target(struct kun struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); struct damon_target *t;
+ if (!c) + kunit_skip(test, "ctx alloc fail"); + t = damon_new_target(); + if (!t) { + damon_destroy_ctx(c); + kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail"); + } KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_targets(c));
damon_add_target(c, t);