Hello.
On čtvrtek 24. března 2022 18:07:29 CET Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Right, but is that sync_for_device call really needed? AFAICT, that ath9k_hw_process_rxdesc_edma() invocation doesn't actually modify any of the data when it returns EINPROGRESS, so could we just skip it? Like the patch below? Or am I misunderstanding the semantics here?
-Toke
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c index 0c0624a3b40d..19244d4c0ada 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c @@ -647,12 +647,8 @@ static bool ath_edma_get_buffers(struct ath_softc *sc, common->rx_bufsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); ret = ath9k_hw_process_rxdesc_edma(ah, rs, skb->data);
if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
/*let device gain the buffer again*/
dma_sync_single_for_device(sc->dev, bf->bf_buf_addr,
common->rx_bufsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) return false;
}
__skb_unlink(skb, &rx_edma->rx_fifo); if (ret == -EINVAL) {
With this patch and both ddbd89deb7d3+aa6f8dcbab47 in place the AP works for me.
Thanks.