4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
commit 4bf5d56d429cbc96c23d809a08f63cd29e1a702e
I'm seeing build failures from the two newly introduced arrays that are marked 'const' and '__initdata', which are mutually exclusive:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:882:43: error: 'cpu_no_speculation' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init' arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:895:43: error: 'cpu_no_meltdown' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init'
The correct annotation is __initconst.
Fixes: fec9434a12f3 ("x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Cc: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Cc: Thomas Garnier thgarnie@google.com Cc: David Woodhouse dwmw@amazon.co.uk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180202213959.611210-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(s #endif }
-static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CEDARVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CLOVERVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_LINCROFT, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_i {} };
-static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { { X86_VENDOR_AMD }, {} };