6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit 3ca1b311181072415b6432a169de765ac2034e5a ]
This is slightly tricky, since the VFS uses non-zeroing allocation to preserve some fields that are left in a consistent state.
Reported-by: Chunsheng Luo luochunsheng@ustc.edu Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250818083224.229-1-luochunsheng@ustc.edu/ Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/fuse/inode.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index fd3321e29a3e5..153f3102f167d 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -94,14 +94,11 @@ static struct inode *fuse_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) if (!fi) return NULL;
- fi->i_time = 0; + /* Initialize private data (i.e. everything except fi->inode) */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct fuse_inode, inode) != 0); + memset((void *) fi + sizeof(fi->inode), 0, sizeof(*fi) - sizeof(fi->inode)); + fi->inval_mask = ~0; - fi->nodeid = 0; - fi->nlookup = 0; - fi->attr_version = 0; - fi->orig_ino = 0; - fi->state = 0; - fi->submount_lookup = NULL; mutex_init(&fi->mutex); spin_lock_init(&fi->lock); fi->forget = fuse_alloc_forget();