4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
[ Upstream commit 4bc83b3f272fe8f36450f9c003df49cf07ffe5fd ]
In the case when the phy_mask is bitwise anded with the phy_index bit is zero the continue statement currently jumps to the next iteration of the while loop and phy_index is never actually incremented, potentially causing an infinite loop if phy_index is less than SCI_MAX_PHS. Fix this by turning the while loop into a for loop.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/scsi/isci/port_config.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/port_config.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/port_config.c @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ sci_mpc_agent_validate_phy_configuration * Note: We have not moved the current phy_index so we will actually * compare the startting phy with itself. * This is expected and required to add the phy to the port. */ - while (phy_index < SCI_MAX_PHYS) { + for (; phy_index < SCI_MAX_PHYS; phy_index++) { if ((phy_mask & (1 << phy_index)) == 0) continue; sci_phy_get_sas_address(&ihost->phys[phy_index], @@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ sci_mpc_agent_validate_phy_configuration &ihost->phys[phy_index]);
assigned_phy_mask |= (1 << phy_index); - phy_index++; }
}