hi Sasha,
On 1/16/19 11:35 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: e1c3743e1a20 powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150.
v4.20.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate
v4.19.15: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate
v4.14.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE")
v4.9.150: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE")
How should we proceed with this patch?
I understand that the commit that this patch fixes is not integrated into stable tree.
I think it does not need to make stable at this moment, thus.
Thanks, Breno