From: Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit 7ca26efb09a1543fddb29308ea3b63b66cb5d3ee ]
The IRQ injection work used spin_lock_irq() to protect the scheduling of the softirq, but spin_lock_bh() should be used.
With spin_lock_irq(), we noticed delay of more than 6 seconds between the time a NAPI polling work is scheduled and the time it is executed.
Fixes: c8a6153b6c59 ("vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace") Cc: xieyongji@bytedance.com
Suggested-by: Jason Wang jasowang@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Message-Id: 20230705114505.63274-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com Acked-by: Jason Wang jasowang@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Xie Yongji xieyongji@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c index 30ae4237f3dd4..564864f039d20 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c @@ -879,10 +879,10 @@ static void vduse_dev_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) { struct vduse_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct vduse_dev, inject);
- spin_lock_irq(&dev->irq_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&dev->irq_lock); if (dev->config_cb.callback) dev->config_cb.callback(dev->config_cb.private); - spin_unlock_irq(&dev->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&dev->irq_lock); }
static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) @@ -890,10 +890,10 @@ static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vduse_virtqueue, inject);
- spin_lock_irq(&vq->irq_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&vq->irq_lock); if (vq->ready && vq->cb.callback) vq->cb.callback(vq->cb.private); - spin_unlock_irq(&vq->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&vq->irq_lock); }
static int vduse_dev_queue_irq_work(struct vduse_dev *dev,