From: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz
commit 6dbf7bb555981fb5faf7b691e8f6169fc2b2e63b upstream.
If block_write_full_page() is called for a page that is beyond current inode size, it will truncate page buffers for the page and return 0. This logic has been added in 2.5.62 in commit 81eb69062588 ("fix ext3 BUG due to race with truncate") in history.git tree to fix a problem with ext3 in data=ordered mode. This particular problem doesn't exist anymore because ext3 is long gone and ext4 handles ordered data differently. Also normally buffers are invalidated by truncate code and there's no need to specially handle this in ->writepage() code.
This invalidation of page buffers in block_write_full_page() is causing issues to filesystems (e.g. ext4 or ocfs2) when block device is shrunk under filesystem's hands and metadata buffers get discarded while being tracked by the journalling layer. Although it is obviously "not supported" it can cause kernel crashes like:
[ 7986.689400] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at +0000000000000008 [ 7986.697197] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 7986.699724] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI [ 7986.703200] CPU: 4 PID: 203778 Comm: jbd2/dm-3-8 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G +O --------- - - 4.18.0-147.5.0.5.h126.eulerosv2r9.x86_64 #1 [ 7986.716438] Hardware name: Huawei RH2288H V3/BC11HGSA0, BIOS 1.57 08/11/2015 [ 7986.723462] RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head+0x1b/0x40 [jbd2] ... [ 7986.810150] Call Trace: [ 7986.812595] __jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint+0x23/0x70 [jbd2] [ 7986.818408] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x155f/0x1b60 [jbd2] [ 7986.836467] kjournald2+0xbd/0x270 [jbd2]
which is not great. The crash happens because bh->b_private is suddently NULL although BH_JBD flag is still set (this is because block_invalidatepage() cleared BH_Mapped flag and subsequent bh lookup found buffer without BH_Mapped set, called init_page_buffers() which has rewritten bh->b_private). So just remove the invalidation in block_write_full_page().
Note that the buffer cache invalidation when block device changes size is already careful to avoid similar problems by using invalidate_mapping_pages() which skips busy buffers so it was only this odd block_write_full_page() behavior that could tear down bdev buffers under filesystem's hands.
Reported-by: Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/buffer.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -2742,16 +2742,6 @@ int nobh_writepage(struct page *page, ge /* Is the page fully outside i_size? (truncate in progress) */ offset = i_size & (PAGE_SIZE-1); if (page->index >= end_index+1 || !offset) { - /* - * The page may have dirty, unmapped buffers. For example, - * they may have been added in ext3_writepage(). Make them - * freeable here, so the page does not leak. - */ -#if 0 - /* Not really sure about this - do we need this ? */ - if (page->mapping->a_ops->invalidatepage) - page->mapping->a_ops->invalidatepage(page, offset); -#endif unlock_page(page); return 0; /* don't care */ } @@ -2946,12 +2936,6 @@ int block_write_full_page(struct page *p /* Is the page fully outside i_size? (truncate in progress) */ offset = i_size & (PAGE_SIZE-1); if (page->index >= end_index+1 || !offset) { - /* - * The page may have dirty, unmapped buffers. For example, - * they may have been added in ext3_writepage(). Make them - * freeable here, so the page does not leak. - */ - do_invalidatepage(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE); unlock_page(page); return 0; /* don't care */ }