From: Yuanzheng Song songyuanzheng@huawei.com
commit 4f5ceb8851f0081af54313abbf56de1615911faf upstream.
When the number of partial slabs in each cache is the same (e.g., the value are 0), the results of the `slabinfo -X -N5` and `slabinfo -P -N5` are different.
/ # slabinfo -X -N5 ... Slabs sorted by number of partial slabs --------------------------------------- Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg inode_cache 15180 392 6217728 758/0/1 20 1 0 95 a kernfs_node_cache 22494 88 2002944 488/0/1 46 0 0 98 shmem_inode_cache 663 464 319488 38/0/1 17 1 0 96 biovec-max 50 3072 163840 4/0/1 10 3 0 93 A dentry 19050 136 2600960 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a
/ # slabinfo -P -N5 Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg bdev_cache 32 984 32.7K 1/0/1 16 2 0 96 Aa ext4_inode_cache 42 752 32.7K 1/0/1 21 2 0 96 a dentry 19050 136 2.6M 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a TCPv6 17 1840 32.7K 0/0/1 17 3 0 95 A RAWv6 18 856 16.3K 0/0/1 18 2 0 94 A
This problem is caused by the sort_slabs(). So let's use alphabetic order when two values are equal in the sort_slabs().
By the way, the content of the `slabinfo -h` is not aligned because the
`-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs`
uses tabs instead of spaces. So let's use spaces instead of tabs to fix it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220528063117.935158-1-songyuanzheng@huawei.com Fixes: 1106b205a3fe ("tools/vm/slabinfo: add partial slab listing to -X") Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song songyuanzheng@huawei.com Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" tobin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/vm/slabinfo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/vm/slabinfo.c +++ b/tools/vm/slabinfo.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void usage(void) "-n|--numa Show NUMA information\n" "-N|--lines=K Show the first K slabs\n" "-o|--ops Show kmem_cache_ops\n" - "-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n" + "-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n" "-r|--report Detailed report on single slabs\n" "-s|--shrink Shrink slabs\n" "-S|--Size Sort by size\n" @@ -1045,15 +1045,27 @@ static void sort_slabs(void) for (s2 = s1 + 1; s2 < slabinfo + slabs; s2++) { int result;
- if (sort_size) - result = slab_size(s1) < slab_size(s2); - else if (sort_active) - result = slab_activity(s1) < slab_activity(s2); - else if (sort_loss) - result = slab_waste(s1) < slab_waste(s2); - else if (sort_partial) - result = s1->partial < s2->partial; - else + if (sort_size) { + if (slab_size(s1) == slab_size(s2)) + result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name); + else + result = slab_size(s1) < slab_size(s2); + } else if (sort_active) { + if (slab_activity(s1) == slab_activity(s2)) + result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name); + else + result = slab_activity(s1) < slab_activity(s2); + } else if (sort_loss) { + if (slab_waste(s1) == slab_waste(s2)) + result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name); + else + result = slab_waste(s1) < slab_waste(s2); + } else if (sort_partial) { + if (s1->partial == s2->partial) + result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name); + else + result = s1->partial < s2->partial; + } else result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
if (show_inverted)