6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 55d49f750b1cb1f177fb1b00ae02cba4613bcfb7 ]
The commit c83597fa5dc6 ("bpf: Refactor some inode/task/sk storage functions for reuse"), refactored the bpf_{sk,task,inode}_storage_free() into bpf_local_storage_unlink_nolock() which then later renamed to bpf_local_storage_destroy(). The commit accidentally passed the "bool uncharge_mem = false" argument to bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock() which then stopped the uncharge from happening to the sk->sk_omem_alloc.
This missing uncharge only happens when the sk is going away (during __sk_destruct).
This patch fixes it by always passing "uncharge_mem = true". It is a noop to the task/inode/cgroup storage because they do not have the map_local_storage_(un)charge enabled in the map_ops. A followup patch will be done in bpf-next to remove the uncharge_mem argument.
A selftest is added in the next patch.
Fixes: c83597fa5dc6 ("bpf: Refactor some inode/task/sk storage functions for reuse") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230901231129.578493-3-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c index 37ad47d52dc55..146824cc96893 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ void bpf_local_storage_destroy(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage) * of the loop will set the free_cgroup_storage to true. */ free_storage = bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock( - local_storage, selem, false, true); + local_storage, selem, true, true); } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);