From: Michael Chan michael.chan@broadcom.com
[ Upstream commit 67681d02aaa1db9044a16df4ca9c77cde1221a3e ]
The logic that polls for the firmware message response uses a shorter sleep interval for the first few passes. But there was a typo so it was using the wrong counter (larger counter) for these short sleep passes. The result is a slightly shorter timeout period for these firmware messages than intended. Fix it by using the proper counter.
Fixes: 9751e8e71487 ("bnxt_en: reduce timeout on initial HWRM calls") Signed-off-by: Michael Chan michael.chan@broadcom.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index 1fdaf86bbe8f..63b97289f4fe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c @@ -3542,7 +3542,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_do_send_msg(struct bnxt *bp, void *msg, u32 msg_len, if (len) break; /* on first few passes, just barely sleep */ - if (i < DFLT_HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT) + if (i < HWRM_SHORT_TIMEOUT_COUNTER) usleep_range(HWRM_SHORT_MIN_TIMEOUT, HWRM_SHORT_MAX_TIMEOUT); else