On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:14:03AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 29.03.24 13:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:42:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 3/29/24 3:35 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:35 AM Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com wrote:
On 3/28/24 8:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 3/18/24 7:52 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:36 AM Andy Shevchenko > andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:41:23PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Commit e5d6bd25f93d ("serial: 8250_dw: Do not reclock if already at >>> correct rate") breaks the dw UARTs on Intel Bay Trail (BYT) and >>> Cherry Trail (CHT) SoCs. >>> >>> Before this change the RTL8732BS Bluetooth HCI which is found >>> connected over the dw UART on both BYT and CHT boards works properly: >>> >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: examining hci_ver=06 hci_rev=000b lmp_ver=06 lmp_subver=8723 >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=1 >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8723bs_fw.bin >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8723bs_config-OBDA8723.bin >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: cfg_sz 64, total sz 24508 >>> Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: fw version 0x365d462e >>> >>> where as after this change probing it fails:
[...]
Acked-by: Peter Collingbourne pcc@google.com
Thanks. Greg can we get this merged please (it is a regression fix for a 6.8 regression) ?
Will queue it up soon, thanks.
You are obviously busy (we really need to enhance Git so it can clone humans, too!), nevertheless: friendly reminder that that fix afaics still is not queued.
"soon" is relative :)
Side note: there is another fix for a serial 6.8 regression I track waiting for review here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20240325071649.27040-1-tony@atomide.com...
It's in my queue, I'll try to get to serial stuff later today, but not promising anything...
thanks,
greg k-h