5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jinjie Ruan ruanjinjie@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 16a0a69244240cfa32c525c021c40f85e090557a ]
If request_irq() fails in sr_late_init(), there is no need to enable the irq, and if it succeeds, disable_irq() after request_irq() still has a time gap in which interrupts can come.
request_irq() with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag will disable IRQ auto-enable when request IRQ.
Fixes: 1279ba5916f6 ("OMAP3+: SR: disable interrupt by default") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan ruanjinjie@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240912034147.3014213-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khilman@baylibre.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c b/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c index 1228a0cba1320..8330098b45df9 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c @@ -213,10 +213,10 @@ static int sr_late_init(struct omap_sr *sr_info)
if (sr_class->notify && sr_class->notify_flags && sr_info->irq) { ret = devm_request_irq(&sr_info->pdev->dev, sr_info->irq, - sr_interrupt, 0, sr_info->name, sr_info); + sr_interrupt, IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, + sr_info->name, sr_info); if (ret) goto error; - disable_irq(sr_info->irq); }
if (pdata && pdata->enable_on_init)