On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:16:03AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
On 05.12.2017 09:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:20:33AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
On 05.12.2017 07:19, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:18:34AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
> Hallo > > someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix. > > > bug report is here: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
( added stable and netdev to CC )
Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3.
Again, can people try 4.14.5-rc1? It should be resolved there.
Oops, that would be 4.14.4-rc1. Any why do you say above that is on the way without a fix, did you test it?
I didn't tested 4.14.4-rc1 but somone from the bug report tested it and told is not resolved.
I'll fire up an build in a bit and let you know.
Great, and maybe cc: the developers and mailing list for this driver at the same time? :)
Greg,
last time I reported something about e100* someone told me to just CC netdev =)
However the issue still remains with 4.14.4-rc1 and NM , and is still fine with connman.
I don't even think is something about the driver itself because I've quick compiled the out-of-tree-e1000e and breaks with NM in the same way. ( which should not be possible ? )
Even when 4.14.3 was biggiSH :) after a quick scan and assuming the e1000e patches are fine , remaining candidates should be the IRQ* and x86/* ones ?
I am not assuming the e1000e patches are all fine :)
Any chance you can do a 'git bisect' between 4.14.2 and 4.14.3 to find the offending patch?
thanks,
greg k-h