4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
commit 38d589f2fd08f1296aea3ce62bebd185125c6d81 upstream.
With the ultimate goal of keeping rt_mutex wait_list and futex_q waiters consistent it's necessary to split 'rt_mutex_futex_lock()' into finer parts, such that only the actual blocking can be done without hb->lock held.
Split split_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() into two parts, one that does the blocking and one that does remove_waiter() when the lock acquire failed.
When the rtmutex was acquired successfully the waiter can be removed in the acquisiton path safely, since there is no concurrency on the lock owner.
This means that, except for futex_lock_pi(), all wait_list modifications are done with both hb->lock and wait_lock held.
[bigeasy@linutronix.de: fix for futex_requeue_pi_signal_restart]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104152.001659630@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra zsm@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- kernel/futex.c | 7 +++-- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 8 +++--- 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2966,10 +2966,13 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u */ WARN_ON(!q.pi_state); pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex; - ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter); - debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter); + ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr); + if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, &rt_waiter)) + ret = 0; + + debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter); /* * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we * haven't already. --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1746,21 +1746,23 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner( }
/** - * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition + * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have * been started. * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter * - * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread. + * Wait for the the lock acquisition started on our behalf by + * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call + * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(). * * Returns: * 0 - success * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT * - * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support + * Special API call for PI-futex support */ -int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, +int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { @@ -1773,9 +1775,6 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt /* sleep on the mutex */ ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
- if (unlikely(ret)) - remove_waiter(lock, waiter); - /* * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might * have to fix that up. @@ -1786,3 +1785,42 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt
return ret; } + +/** + * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition + * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * + * Attempt to clean up after a failed rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(). + * + * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can + * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can + * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the + * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure. + * + * Returns: + * true - did the cleanup, we done. + * false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned, + * caller should disregards its return value. + * + * Special API call for PI-futex support + */ +bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + bool cleanup = false; + + raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + /* + * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list. + * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list. + */ + if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) { + remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + cleanup = true; + } + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + + return cleanup; +} --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -107,9 +107,11 @@ extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task); -extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter); +extern int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter); +extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter); extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to); extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct wake_q_head *wqh);