6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com
commit 6a1ab50135ce829b834b448ce49867b5210a1641 upstream.
The stripe offset calculation in the zoned code for raid0 and raid10 wrongly uses map->stripe_size to calculate it. In fact, map->stripe_size is the size of the device extent composing the block group, which always is the zone_size on the zoned setup.
Fix it by using BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN and BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT. Also, optimize the calculation a bit by doing the common calculation only once.
Fixes: c0d90a79e8e6 ("btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.17+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c @@ -1523,6 +1523,8 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0( u64 last_alloc) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info; + u64 stripe_nr = 0, stripe_offset = 0; + u32 stripe_index = 0;
if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) { btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree", @@ -1530,28 +1532,26 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0( return -EINVAL; }
+ if (last_alloc) { + u32 factor = map->num_stripes; + + stripe_nr = last_alloc >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT; + stripe_offset = last_alloc & BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK; + stripe_nr = div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, factor, &stripe_index); + } + for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) { if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV) continue;
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) { - u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr; - u64 stripe_offset; - int stripe_index; - - stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size); - stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size; - full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes); - div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes, &stripe_index);
- zone_info[i].alloc_offset = - full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size; + zone_info[i].alloc_offset = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(stripe_nr);
if (stripe_index > i) - zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size; + zone_info[i].alloc_offset += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN; else if (stripe_index == i) - zone_info[i].alloc_offset += - (last_alloc - stripe_offset); + zone_info[i].alloc_offset += stripe_offset; }
if (test_bit(0, active) != test_bit(i, active)) { @@ -1575,6 +1575,8 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10 u64 last_alloc) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info; + u64 stripe_nr = 0, stripe_offset = 0; + u32 stripe_index = 0;
if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) { btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree", @@ -1582,6 +1584,14 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10 return -EINVAL; }
+ if (last_alloc) { + u32 factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes; + + stripe_nr = last_alloc >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT; + stripe_offset = last_alloc & BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK; + stripe_nr = div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, factor, &stripe_index); + } + for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) { if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV) continue; @@ -1595,26 +1605,12 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10 }
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) { - u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr; - u64 stripe_offset; - int stripe_index; - - stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size); - stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size; - full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, - map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes); - div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, - (map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes), - &stripe_index); - - zone_info[i].alloc_offset = - full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size; + zone_info[i].alloc_offset = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(stripe_nr);
if (stripe_index > (i / map->sub_stripes)) - zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size; + zone_info[i].alloc_offset += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN; else if (stripe_index == (i / map->sub_stripes)) - zone_info[i].alloc_offset += - (last_alloc - stripe_offset); + zone_info[i].alloc_offset += stripe_offset; }
if ((i % map->sub_stripes) == 0) {