On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:18:57AM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 04:56 +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Jerome Brunet jbrunet@baylibre.com
[ Upstream commit 9042b46eda33ef5db3cdfc9e12b3c8cabb196141 ]
Always check phy_write return values. Better to be safe than sorry
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet jbrunet@baylibre.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Hi Sasha,
I have recently received a few mails from you with [PATCH AUTOSEL], such as this one. I'm wondering what are the criteria to select these patches? This one does not have a "Fixes" tag and, I believe, stable was not CCed of the original patch. Do you have another selection method ?
I really sorry if you already got this question a thousand times.
I have nothing against this patch making its way to a stable release BTW, it won't do any harm.
Sasha, I think by now we need a "FAQ" link somewhere to point people at that describes how these patches are being selected as it comes up every other week or so, and I imagine you are getting tired of repeating yourself :)
If you want me to find some place on kernel.org to put the text, I'll be glad to do so.
thanks,
greg k-h