As Jan reported [1], lockdep complains about the VGIC not being bullet proof. This seems to be due to two issues: - When commit 006df0f34930 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support calling vgic_update_irq_pending from irq context") promoted irq_lock and ap_list_lock to _irqsave, we forgot two instances of irq_lock. lockdeps seems to pick those up. - If a lock is _irqsave, any other locks we take inside them should be _irqsafe as well. So the lpi_list_lock needs to be promoted also.
This fixes both issues by simply making the remaining instances of those locks _irqsave. One irq_lock is addressed in a separate patch, to simplify backporting.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 006df0f34930 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support calling vgic_update_irq_pending from irq context") Reported-by: Jan Glauber jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-May/575718.html --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.c | 5 +++-- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 10 ++++++---- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.c index 10b38178cff2..4ffc0b5e6105 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.c @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int vgic_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) struct vgic_state_iter *iter = (struct vgic_state_iter *)v; struct vgic_irq *irq; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL; + unsigned long flags;
if (iter->dist_id == 0) { print_dist_state(s, &kvm->arch.vgic); @@ -227,9 +228,9 @@ static int vgic_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) irq = &kvm->arch.vgic.spis[iter->intid - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS]; }
- spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags); print_irq_state(s, irq, vcpu); - spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
return 0; } diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index a8f07243aa9f..41abf92f2699 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, NULL, intid), *oldirq; + unsigned long flags; int ret;
/* In this case there is no put, since we keep the reference. */ @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, irq->intid = intid; irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
- spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
/* * There could be a race with another vgic_add_lpi(), so we need to @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, dist->lpi_list_count++;
out_unlock: - spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
/* * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's. @@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ static int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_irq *irq; + unsigned long flags; u32 *intids; int irq_count, i = 0;
@@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ static int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr) if (!intids) return -ENOMEM;
- spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) { if (i == irq_count) break; @@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ static int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr) continue; intids[i++] = irq->intid; } - spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
*intid_ptr = intids; return i; diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c index c62ecca24579..f7dc2347395b 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c @@ -43,9 +43,13 @@ struct vgic_global kvm_vgic_global_state __ro_after_init = { * kvm->lock (mutex) * its->cmd_lock (mutex) * its->its_lock (mutex) - * vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock - * kvm->lpi_list_lock - * vgic_irq->irq_lock + * vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled + * kvm->lpi_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled + * vgic_irq->irq_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled + * + * As the ap_list_lock might be taken from the timer interrupt handler, + * we have to disable IRQs before taking this lock and everything lower + * than it. * * If you need to take multiple locks, always take the upper lock first, * then the lower ones, e.g. first take the its_lock, then the irq_lock. @@ -72,8 +76,9 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_irq *irq = NULL; + unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) { if (irq->intid != intid) @@ -89,7 +94,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid) irq = NULL;
out_unlock: - spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
return irq; } @@ -134,19 +139,20 @@ static void vgic_irq_release(struct kref *ref) void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; + unsigned long flags;
if (irq->intid < VGIC_MIN_LPI) return;
- spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); if (!kref_put(&irq->refcount, vgic_irq_release)) { - spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); return; };
list_del(&irq->lpi_list); dist->lpi_list_count--; - spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
kfree(irq); }