From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
[ Upstream commit d203b0fd863a2261e5d00b97f3d060c4c2a6db71 ]
Instead of relying on current env->pass_cnt, use the seen count from the old aux data in adjust_insn_aux_data(), and expand it to the new range of patched instructions. This change is valid given we always expand 1:n with n>=1, so what applies to the old/original instruction needs to apply for the replacement as well.
Not relying on env->pass_cnt is a prerequisite for a later change where we want to avoid marking an instruction seen when verified under speculative execution path.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Reviewed-by: John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Benedict Schlueter benedict.schlueter@rub.de Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index da8fc57ff5b2..71ac1da127a6 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -10475,6 +10475,7 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, { struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; struct bpf_insn *insn = new_prog->insnsi; + u32 old_seen = old_data[off].seen; u32 prog_len; int i;
@@ -10495,7 +10496,8 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); for (i = off; i < off + cnt - 1; i++) { - new_data[i].seen = env->pass_cnt; + /* Expand insni[off]'s seen count to the patched range. */ + new_data[i].seen = old_seen; new_data[i].zext_dst = insn_has_def32(env, insn + i); } env->insn_aux_data = new_data;