5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit bad1a11c0f061aa073bab785389fe04f19ba02e1 ]
rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu() should make the "seq" counter odd on the second pass, otherwise read_seqbegin_or_lock() never takes the lock.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Howells dhowells@redhat.com cc: Marc Dionne marc.dionne@auristor.com cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117164846.GA10410@redhat.com/ Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/rxrpc/conn_service.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c index 68508166bbc0..af0e95ef992d 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer, struct rxrpc_conn_proto k; struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb); struct rb_node *p; - unsigned int seq = 0; + unsigned int seq = 1;
k.epoch = sp->hdr.epoch; k.cid = sp->hdr.cid & RXRPC_CIDMASK; @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer, * under just the RCU read lock, so we have to check for * changes. */ + seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */ read_seqbegin_or_lock(&peer->service_conn_lock, &seq);
p = rcu_dereference_raw(peer->service_conns.rb_node);