From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
commit 973377ffe8148180b2651825b92ae91988141b05 upstream
In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths under speculative execution.
There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the test->insn_processed check to privileged-only.
In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value pointer on one side of the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Reviewed-by: John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait ovidiu.panait@windriver.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 14 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c | 10 +++++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 ++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 7 +++--- 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 9be395d9dc64..a4c55fcb0e7b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, } }
- if (test->insn_processed) { + if (!unpriv && test->insn_processed) { uint32_t insn_processed; char *proc;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c index ca8fdb1b3f01..7d7ebee5cc7a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0 }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 8a1caf46ffbc..e061e8799ce2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -508,6 +508,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, { @@ -528,6 +530,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, { @@ -569,6 +573,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -589,6 +595,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -609,6 +617,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -674,6 +684,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -695,6 +707,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c index 5cf361d8eb1c..721ec9391be5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_0, 10, -4), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 7, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c index bd5cae4a7f73..1c857b2fbdf0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -150,6 +152,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -213,6 +217,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -280,6 +286,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -348,6 +356,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -416,6 +426,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -484,6 +496,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -552,6 +566,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -620,6 +636,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -688,6 +706,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -756,6 +776,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c index 8dcd4e0383d5..11fc68da735e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c @@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .retval_unpriv = 1, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .retval = 1, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c index c7854d784a5d..9dfb68c8c78d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c index 7ae2859d495c..a3e593ddfafc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 pointer comparison prohibited", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), // fake-dead code; targeted from branch A to - // prevent dead code sanitization + // prevent dead code sanitization, rejected + // via branch B however BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .retval = 0, }, {