This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target: fix ALUA transition timeout handling
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...
The filename of the patch is: target-fix-alua-transition-timeout-handling.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Mike Christie mchristi@redhat.com Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:59:48 -0600 Subject: target: fix ALUA transition timeout handling
From: Mike Christie mchristi@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit d7175373f2745ed4abe5b388d5aabd06304f801e ]
The implicit transition time tells initiators the min time to wait before timing out a transition. We currently schedule the transition to occur in tg_pt_gp_implicit_trans_secs seconds so there is no room for delays. If core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work->core_alua_update_tpg_primary_metadata needs to write out info to a remote file, then the initiator can easily time out the operation.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie mchristi@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger nab@linux-iscsi.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/target/target_core_alua.c | 23 ++++++++--------------- include/target/target_core_base.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void core_alua_queue_state_change static void core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *tg_pt_gp = container_of(work, - struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp, tg_pt_gp_transition_work.work); + struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp, tg_pt_gp_transition_work); struct se_device *dev = tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_dev; bool explicit = (tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_status == ALUA_STATUS_ALTERED_BY_EXPLICIT_STPG); @@ -1073,13 +1073,12 @@ static int core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt /* * Flush any pending transitions */ - if (!explicit && tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_implicit_trans_secs && - atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) == + if (!explicit && atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) == ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_TRANSITION) { /* Just in case */ tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_pending_state = new_state; tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = &wait; - flush_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work); + flush_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work); wait_for_completion(&wait); tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = NULL; return 0; @@ -1114,15 +1113,9 @@ static int core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt atomic_inc(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_ref_cnt); spin_unlock(&dev->t10_alua.tg_pt_gps_lock);
- if (!explicit && tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_implicit_trans_secs) { - unsigned long transition_tmo; - - transition_tmo = tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_implicit_trans_secs * HZ; - schedule_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, - transition_tmo); - } else { + schedule_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work); + if (explicit) { tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = &wait; - schedule_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, 0); wait_for_completion(&wait); tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = NULL; } @@ -1690,8 +1683,8 @@ struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *core_alua_allo mutex_init(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_md_mutex); spin_lock_init(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock); atomic_set(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_ref_cnt, 0); - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, - core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work); + INIT_WORK(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, + core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work); tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_dev = dev; atomic_set(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state, ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_ACTIVE_OPTIMIZED); @@ -1799,7 +1792,7 @@ void core_alua_free_tg_pt_gp( dev->t10_alua.alua_tg_pt_gps_counter--; spin_unlock(&dev->t10_alua.tg_pt_gps_lock);
- flush_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work); + flush_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work);
/* * Allow a struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member * referenced by --- a/include/target/target_core_base.h +++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp { struct list_head tg_pt_gp_lun_list; struct se_lun *tg_pt_gp_alua_lun; struct se_node_acl *tg_pt_gp_alua_nacl; - struct delayed_work tg_pt_gp_transition_work; + struct work_struct tg_pt_gp_transition_work; struct completion *tg_pt_gp_transition_complete; };
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mchristi@redhat.com are
queue-4.9/target-use-system-workqueue-for-alua-transitions.patch queue-4.9/target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch queue-4.9/target-fix-alua-transition-timeout-handling.patch queue-4.9/target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch