Fedor Pchelkin pchelkin@ispras.ru wrote:
Now that nullfunc skbs are recycled in a separate work item in the driver, the following race during initialization and processing of those skbs might lead to noticeable bugs:
Waiting thread Completing threadrtw89_core_send_nullfunc() rtw89_core_tx_write_link() ... rtw89_pci_txwd_submit() skb_data->wait = NULL /* add skb to the queue */ skb_queue_tail(&txwd->queue, skb) rtw89_pci_napi_poll() ... rtw89_pci_release_txwd_skb() /* get skb from the queue */ skb_unlink(skb, &txwd->queue) rtw89_pci_tx_status() rtw89_core_tx_wait_complete() /* use incorrect skb_data->wait */ rtw89_core_tx_kick_off_and_wait() /* assign skb_data->wait but too late */
The value of skb_data->wait indicates whether skb is passed on to the core ieee80211 stack or released by the driver itself. So assure that by the time skb is added to txwd queue and becomes visible to the completing side, it has already allocated tx_wait-related data (in case it's needed).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Fixes: 1ae5ca615285 ("wifi: rtw89: add function to wait for completion of TX skbs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin pchelkin@ispras.ru
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++--------- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c index 5c964283cd67..57f20559dfde 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c @@ -1094,20 +1094,12 @@ int rtw89_core_tx_kick_off_and_wait(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *sk int qsel, unsigned int timeout) { struct rtw89_tx_skb_data *skb_data = RTW89_TX_SKB_CB(skb);
struct rtw89_tx_wait_info *wait;
struct rtw89_tx_wait_info *wait = skb_data->wait;
wiphy_dereference(rtwdev->hw->wiphy, skb_data->wait)
unsigned long time_left; int ret = 0; lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
wait = kzalloc(sizeof(*wait), GFP_KERNEL);if (!wait) {rtw89_core_tx_kick_off(rtwdev, qsel);return 0;}init_completion(&wait->completion);rcu_assign_pointer(skb_data->wait, wait); wait->skb = skb;
Also, move "wait->skb = skb" to where wait is initialized.
rtw89_core_tx_kick_off(rtwdev, qsel); @@ -1172,10 +1164,12 @@ intrtw89_h2c_tx(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, static int rtw89_core_tx_write_link(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link,
struct sk_buff *skb, int *qsel, bool sw_mld)
struct sk_buff *skb, int *qsel, bool sw_mld,struct rtw89_tx_wait_info *wait){ struct ieee80211_sta *sta = rtwsta_link_to_sta_safe(rtwsta_link); struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link);
struct rtw89_tx_skb_data *skb_data = RTW89_TX_SKB_CB(skb); struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = rtwvif_link->rtwvif; struct rtw89_core_tx_request tx_req = {}; int ret;@@ -1192,6 +1186,8 @@ static int rtw89_core_tx_write_link(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, rtw89_core_tx_update_desc_info(rtwdev, &tx_req); rtw89_core_tx_wake(rtwdev, &tx_req);
rcu_assign_pointer(skb_data->wait, wait);ret = rtw89_hci_tx_write(rtwdev, &tx_req); if (ret) { rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to transmit skb to HCI\n"); @@ -1228,7 +1224,8@@ int rtw89_core_tx_write(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, } }
return rtw89_core_tx_write_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link, skb, qsel, false);
return rtw89_core_tx_write_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link, skb, qsel, false,NULL);}
static __le32 rtw89_build_txwd_body0(struct rtw89_tx_desc_info *desc_info) @@ -3426,6 +3423,7 @@ int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif_link *rt struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link); int link_id = ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) ? rtwvif_link->link_id : -1; struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
struct rtw89_tx_wait_info *wait; struct ieee80211_sta *sta; struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr; struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta;@@ -3435,6 +3433,12 @@ int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif_link *rt if (vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION || !vif->cfg.assoc) return 0;
wait = kzalloc(sizeof(*wait), GFP_KERNEL);if (!wait)return -ENOMEM;init_completion(&wait->completion);rcu_read_lock(); sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, vif->cfg.ap_addr); if (!sta) {@@ -3459,7 +3463,8 @@ int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif_link *rt goto out; }
Fill wait->skb as mentioned above.
ret = rtw89_core_tx_write_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link, skb, &qsel, true);
ret = rtw89_core_tx_write_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link, skb, &qsel, true,wait); if (ret) { rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "nullfunc transmit failed: %d\n", ret); dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);@@ -3472,6 +3477,7 @@ int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif_link *rt timeout); out: rcu_read_unlock();
kfree(wait); return ret;} diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c index 4e3034b44f56..cb9682f306a6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c @@ -1372,7 +1372,6 @@ static int rtw89_pci_txwd_submit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct pci_dev *pdev = rtwpci->pdev; struct sk_buff *skb = tx_req->skb; struct rtw89_pci_tx_data *tx_data = RTW89_PCI_TX_SKB_CB(skb);
struct rtw89_tx_skb_data *skb_data = RTW89_TX_SKB_CB(skb); bool en_wd_info = desc_info->en_wd_info; u32 txwd_len; u32 txwp_len;@@ -1388,7 +1387,6 @@ static int rtw89_pci_txwd_submit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, }
tx_data->dma = dma;
rcu_assign_pointer(skb_data->wait, NULL); txwp_len = sizeof(*txwp_info); txwd_len = chip->txwd_body_size;-- 2.51.0