6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hyejeong Choi hjeong.choi@samsung.com
commit 72c7d62583ebce7baeb61acce6057c361f73be4a upstream.
smp_store_mb() inserts memory barrier after storing operation. It is different with what the comment is originally aiming so Null pointer dereference can be happened if memory update is reordered.
Signed-off-by: Hyejeong Choi hjeong.choi@samsung.com Fixes: a590d0fdbaa5 ("dma-buf: Update reservation shared_count after adding the new fence") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513020638.GA2329653@au1-maretx-p37.eng.sarc.s... Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c @@ -313,8 +313,9 @@ void dma_resv_add_fence(struct dma_resv count++;
dma_resv_list_set(fobj, i, fence, usage); - /* pointer update must be visible before we extend the num_fences */ - smp_store_mb(fobj->num_fences, count); + /* fence update must be visible before we extend the num_fences */ + smp_wmb(); + fobj->num_fences = count; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_add_fence);