6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com
[ Upstream commit 8cca35cb29f81eba3e96ec44dad8696c8a2f9138 ]
Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS="-O rst" to force the usage of the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep:
BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started
============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250
but task is already holding lock: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250
other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 ---- lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by btrfs/2326: #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250
stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80 __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0 ? btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100 down_read+0x8e/0x440 ? btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0xd69/0x1d00 ? btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0xd9/0x2e0 ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x6e/0x70 ? __pfx_btrfs_map_block+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1f2/0x300 ? mempool_alloc_noprof+0xed/0x2b0 btrfs_submit_chunk+0x28d/0x17e0 ? __pfx_btrfs_submit_chunk+0x10/0x10 ? bvec_alloc+0xd7/0x1b0 ? bio_add_folio+0x171/0x270 ? __pfx_bio_add_folio+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_read+0x20/0x20 btrfs_submit_bio+0x37/0x80 read_extent_buffer_pages+0x3df/0x6c0 btrfs_read_extent_buffer+0x13e/0x5f0 read_tree_block+0x81/0xe0 read_block_for_search+0x4bd/0x7a0 ? __pfx_read_block_for_search+0x10/0x10 btrfs_search_slot+0x78d/0x2720 ? __pfx_btrfs_search_slot+0x10/0x10 ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100 ? kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x6e/0x70 ? kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1f2/0x300 btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset+0x181/0x820 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset+0x10/0x10 ? down_read+0x194/0x440 ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 btrfs_map_block+0x5b5/0x2250 ? __pfx_btrfs_map_block+0x10/0x10 scrub_submit_initial_read+0x8fe/0x11b0 ? __pfx_scrub_submit_initial_read+0x10/0x10 submit_initial_group_read+0x161/0x3a0 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? __pfx_submit_initial_group_read+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 scrub_simple_mirror.isra.0+0x3eb/0x580 scrub_stripe+0xe4d/0x1440 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? __pfx_scrub_stripe+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 scrub_chunk+0x257/0x4a0 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x64c/0xf70 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x147/0x5f0 ? __pfx_scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x10/0x10 ? bit_wait_timeout+0xb0/0x170 ? __up_read+0x189/0x700 ? scrub_workers_get+0x231/0x300 ? up_write+0x490/0x4f0 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x52e/0xcd0 ? create_pending_snapshots+0x230/0x250 ? __pfx_btrfs_scrub_dev+0x10/0x10 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0xd69/0x1d00 ? lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0 ? __pfx_btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? btrfs_ioctl+0xa09/0x74f0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x240 ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 btrfs_ioctl+0xa14/0x74f0 ? lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? __pfx_btrfs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? do_sigaction+0x3f0/0x860 ? __pfx_do_vfs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x240 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x270/0x3e0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 ? do_sigaction+0x3f0/0x860 ? __pfx_do_sigaction+0x10/0x10 ? __x64_sys_rt_sigaction+0x18e/0x1e0 ? __pfx___x64_sys_rt_sigaction+0x10/0x10 ? __x64_sys_close+0x7c/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x137/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x71/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f0bd1114f9b Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f0bd1114f71. RSP: 002b:00007ffc8a8c3130 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f0bd1114f9b RDX: 00007ffc8a8c35e0 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007 R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc8a8c6c85 R13: 00000000398e72a0 R14: 0000000000004361 R15: 0000000000000004 </TASK>
This happens because on RAID stripe-tree filesystems we recurse back into btrfs_map_block() on scrub to perform the logical to device physical mapping.
But as the device replace task is already holding the dev_replace::rwsem we deadlock.
So don't take the dev_replace::rwsem in case our task is the task performing the device replace.
Suggested-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/fs.h | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 +++++--- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c index 8400e212e3304..f77ef719a3b11 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c @@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ static int btrfs_dev_replace_start(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, return ret;
down_write(&dev_replace->rwsem); + dev_replace->replace_task = current; switch (dev_replace->replace_state) { case BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_NEVER_STARTED: case BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_FINISHED: @@ -976,6 +977,7 @@ static int btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, list_add(&tgt_device->dev_alloc_list, &fs_devices->alloc_list); fs_devices->rw_devices++;
+ dev_replace->replace_task = NULL; up_write(&dev_replace->rwsem); btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(fs_info);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/fs.h b/fs/btrfs/fs.h index a523d64d54912..d24d41f7811a6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/fs.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/fs.h @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace {
struct percpu_counter bio_counter; wait_queue_head_t replace_wait; + + struct task_struct *replace_task; };
/* diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index d2285c9726e7b..790e30e2101a6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -6313,13 +6313,15 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op, &stripe_offset, &raid56_full_stripe_start); *length = min_t(u64, em->len - map_offset, max_len);
- down_read(&dev_replace->rwsem); + if (dev_replace->replace_task != current) + down_read(&dev_replace->rwsem); + dev_replace_is_ongoing = btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(dev_replace); /* * Hold the semaphore for read during the whole operation, write is * requested at commit time but must wait. */ - if (!dev_replace_is_ongoing) + if (!dev_replace_is_ongoing && dev_replace->replace_task != current) up_read(&dev_replace->rwsem);
num_stripes = 1; @@ -6509,7 +6511,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op, bioc->mirror_num = mirror_num;
out: - if (dev_replace_is_ongoing) { + if (dev_replace_is_ongoing && dev_replace->replace_task != current) { lockdep_assert_held(&dev_replace->rwsem); /* Unlock and let waiting writers proceed */ up_read(&dev_replace->rwsem);