On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.272 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:58:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.272-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 4.14.272-rc2 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.14.y * git commit: e991f498ccbf4fc46e0525c0ca02e4134f253706 * git describe: v4.14.271-23-ge991f498ccbf * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14....
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.14.271) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.14.271) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.14.271) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.14.271) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 77914, pass: 65222, fail: 257, skip: 11064, xfail: 1371
## Build Summary * arm: 280 total, 270 passed, 10 failed * arm64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 12 passed, 48 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org