From: Paolo Valente paolo.valente@linaro.org
[ Upstream commit 15729ff8143f8135b03988a100a19e66d7cb7ecd ]
A crash [1] happened to be triggered in conjunction with commit 2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges"). The latter was then reverted by commit ebc69e897e17 ("Revert "block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges""). Yet, the reverted commit was not the one introducing the bug. In fact, it actually triggered a UAF introduced by a different commit, and now fixed by commit d29bd41428cf ("block, bfq: reset last_bfqq_created on group change").
So, there is no point in keeping commit 2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges") out. This commit restores it.
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214503
Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte holger@applied-asynchrony.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente paolo.valente@linaro.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125181510.15004-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 8735f075230f..1dff82d34b44 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2782,6 +2782,15 @@ bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) * are likely to increase the throughput. */ bfqq->new_bfqq = new_bfqq; + /* + * The above assignment schedules the following redirections: + * each time some I/O for bfqq arrives, the process that + * generated that I/O is disassociated from bfqq and + * associated with new_bfqq. Here we increases new_bfqq->ref + * in advance, adding the number of processes that are + * expected to be associated with new_bfqq as they happen to + * issue I/O. + */ new_bfqq->ref += process_refs; return new_bfqq; } @@ -2844,6 +2853,10 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, { struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq;
+ /* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */ + if (bfqq->new_bfqq) + return bfqq->new_bfqq; + /* * Check delayed stable merge for rotational or non-queueing * devs. For this branch to be executed, bfqq must not be @@ -2945,9 +2958,6 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(bfqq)) return NULL;
- if (bfqq->new_bfqq) - return bfqq->new_bfqq; - if (!io_struct || unlikely(bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq)) return NULL;