Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:55:38PM +0100:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.231 release. There are 459 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:41:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.231-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 2146a7485c27 ("Linux 5.10.231-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com
Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix the naming style for mask definition
Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage
Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de ASoC: fsl_micfil: use GENMASK to define register bit fields
Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de ASoC: fsl_micfil: do not define SHIFT/MASK for single bits
Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read
Just a note on these, our version (from nxp) of this was full of conflicts and too much effort to merge for something I cannot test easily, so I squashed out this part and re-cherry-picked just commits c808e277bcdf ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read") and 06df673d2023 ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage")
The other three commits are marked as a stable dep of 06df673d2023 but it really is trivial to backport and not worth the risk to me; if you'd like me to send the minimal backport I used I'll be happy to.
(but, as far as I'm concerned I'm fine as is as well and consider this closed; just reporting I didn't test this 100% as is. Not that my automated test actually exercises the micfil code anyway...)
Thanks,