From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
commit e8a0e30b742f76ebd0f3b196973df4bf65d8fbbb upstream.
After making acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() use the "no limit" value for its frequency QoS request when _PPC returns 0, it is not necessary to replace the frequency corresponding to the first _PSS return package entry with the maximum turbo frequency of the given CPU in intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits() any more, so drop the code doing that along with the comment explaining it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Tested-by: Hagar Hemdan hagarhem@amazon.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -448,20 +448,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_ (u32) cpu->acpi_perf_data.states[i].control); }
- /* - * The _PSS table doesn't contain whole turbo frequency range. - * This just contains +1 MHZ above the max non turbo frequency, - * with control value corresponding to max turbo ratio. But - * when cpufreq set policy is called, it will call with this - * max frequency, which will cause a reduced performance as - * this driver uses real max turbo frequency as the max - * frequency. So correct this frequency in _PSS table to - * correct max turbo frequency based on the turbo state. - * Also need to convert to MHz as _PSS freq is in MHz. - */ - if (!global.turbo_disabled) - cpu->acpi_perf_data.states[0].core_frequency = - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 1000; cpu->valid_pss_table = true; pr_debug("_PPC limits will be enforced\n");